| |
| | Joined: Mar 2002 Posts: 384 Member | | Member Joined: Mar 2002 Posts: 384 | I'm curious, as a technician, what port numbers/services should I commit to memory? Like Port 80, 25, and the like.
"Remember how much fun you had shooting spitwads at the teacher in seventh grade? Imagine applying that kind of attitude to actually [censored] with Mitsubishi!"
- Jello Biafra
| | | |
▼ Sponsored Links ▼
▲ Sponsored Links ▲
| | | | Joined: Mar 2002 Posts: 270 UGN Member | | UGN Member Joined: Mar 2002 Posts: 270 | If I was to name some important ones of the top of my head I would say :
20 - FTP-data
21 - FTP
22 - SSH
23 - Telnet
25 - SMTP
67 - Bootps
68 - Bootpc
69 - TFTP
80 - HTTP
110 - POP3
119 - NNTP
123 - NTP
143 - IMAP
161 - SNMP
546 - DHCP Client
547 - DHCP Server
1080 - Socks
6667 - IRC
Thats all I can think off about now
Unless you try something to which you have not already succeeded ~ Then you shall NEVER grow | | | | | Joined: Feb 2002 Posts: 7,203 Likes: 11 Community Owner | | Community Owner Joined: Feb 2002 Posts: 7,203 Likes: 11 | 21 - FTP
22 - SSH
23 - Telnet
25 - SMTP
69 - TFTP
80 - HTTP (Proxy Common)
110 - POP3
143 - IMAP
1080 - Socks
3128 - Squid Proxy
6660-6669 - IRC (common)
8080 - HTTPd Proxy
Keep in mind that most any server will allow you to change the standard port, so the onlyway to test will be to probe the port. A good tool for this would be to put SuperScan 3.0 on a floppy or usb pen and build a custom list, it has a good starter list included. | | | | | Joined: Jun 2003 Posts: 807 Likes: 2 UGN Super Poster | | UGN Super Poster Joined: Jun 2003 Posts: 807 Likes: 2 | | | | | | Joined: Apr 2005 Posts: 247 UGN Member | | UGN Member Joined: Apr 2005 Posts: 247 | Giz: I use SuperScan 4, is there any particular reason why you mentioned 3 specifically?
"We can categorically state that we have not released man-eating badgers into the area."
-UK military spokesman Major Mike Shearer
| | | | | Joined: Jun 2003 Posts: 807 Likes: 2 UGN Super Poster | | UGN Super Poster Joined: Jun 2003 Posts: 807 Likes: 2 | | | | | | Joined: Oct 2003 Posts: 1,449 UGN Elite Poster | | UGN Elite Poster Joined: Oct 2003 Posts: 1,449 | SuperScan 3.0 is from the original author, Superscan 4.0 is stripped down and cannot scan a class B.
Also Ghost, yeh, we'll throw the windows commandline version of nmap on a usb pen for practical applications on a windows 98 machine when we can just use something everyone here has used on a day to day basis :gag: | | | | | Joined: Jun 2003 Posts: 807 Likes: 2 UGN Super Poster | | UGN Super Poster Joined: Jun 2003 Posts: 807 Likes: 2 | but <3 nmap  Plus it works with SP2. As far as I know SYN scanning with super scan is subject to SP2's disabling of 'raw' sockets. AND it has all sorts of other wonderful scan options that I don't recall superscan having. | | | | | Joined: Mar 2002 Posts: 384 Member | | Member Joined: Mar 2002 Posts: 384 | I like my Packetizer and Ethereal 
"Remember how much fun you had shooting spitwads at the teacher in seventh grade? Imagine applying that kind of attitude to actually [censored] with Mitsubishi!"
- Jello Biafra
| | | | | Joined: Mar 2002 Posts: 815 nobody | | nobody Joined: Mar 2002 Posts: 815 | you forgot:
389 ldap
The 'only' port scanner to use is nmap. Ghost is right. | | | | | Joined: Feb 2002 Posts: 7,203 Likes: 11 Community Owner | | Community Owner Joined: Feb 2002 Posts: 7,203 Likes: 11 | Originally posted by sinetific:
Ghost is right. I bet you that really pained you to say... | | |
| Forums41 Topics33,840 Posts68,858 Members2,176 | | Most Online3,253
Jan 13th, 2020 | | |
|
| |
